Thursday, July 21, 2011

A Father's Rights - based on a true story - Ryder vs The State of Tennessee


A Father's Rights is a movie based on a true story about a father's struggle with the legal system in how his daughter, who was born out of wedlock, was treated differently than other children while fighting for his rights to have a say in said daughter's life.

Posted in Liberty by,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

Lawless America

--------Read more!-----

Sunday, July 17, 2011

WE THE PEOPLE TAR - Critical Thinking

This is a teaser intro for an article i wrote on

"With our initial introduction of our Cultural and Political Movement to the world accomplished, Critical Thinking is the very next highest priority principle that we would like to address.
WE THE PEOPLE TAR is now going to say something to you that no American Politician would ever dare say, "Don't believe anything we tell you... Don't believe anything we tell you until you can verify it for yourself with other sources that you trust and are able to defend it to anyone who would be critical of that position...

In other words, Think Critically! It is important that you take ownership of your own perception of reality. One way to do this is through critical thinking. (simpler) (complex) Critical Thinking is not about telling you what to think, it is about telling you how to think. 

"Television images lull us into thinking that they are real, that they aren't iconic signs at all but realities. Since we see them, we trust them, often failing to realize that, like all signs, they have been constructed with a certain interest behind them." To take ownership of your perspective of reality, It is important that you recognize how to detect bias and propaganda in the Major media  and .

The Censorship, Propaganda and Indoctrination of Major Corporate Media and the Government is much less effective when you defend your perspective of reality by Thinking Critically.
To protect yourself even further, you should also...."

To Continue reading for free, click here

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense”

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking to read and reflect upon what I have written.

I mutually pledge my life, my fortune and my sacred honor to our mutual endeavors of restoring liberty and economic opportunity to WE THE PEOPLE as our Founding Fathers envisioned and intended.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

--------Read more!-----

Wednesday, July 13, 2011

Suggested Common Sense Resolution to the Federal and Minnesota Budget Impasse Continue reading on Suggested Common Sense Resolution to the Federal and Minnesota Budget Impasse

This is a teaser for an article that i wrote on

"First of all, you may ask, who am I to even propose a solution to what all of my state and federal elected officials cannot figure out how to resolve ? 
According to my elected officials I am just a subject peasant in the Feudal hierarchy of the USA.

Then, from my personal point of view, I am not even being compensated.  Yet, because it bothers me that my fellow Subjects, otherwise formerly referred to as WE THE PEOPLE in the constitution, are caused distress by the uncertainty this mess the Ruling Class has inflicted on us causes.

So, despite my obvious lack of qualifications as determined by the Ruling Class incumbent Politicians, I am going to take a common sense approach to the budget impasse of both the State of Minnesota and the Federal Government.   Further, despite the appearance that none of our elected officials abide by the constitution and that they treat WE THE PEOPLE as though they rule us rather than represent us, I am going to give my opinion from the perspective of reality in which WE THE PEOPLE are the Sovereign Citizens of this Country, and where our Elected Officials are Public Servants not Royalty.

First some general observations and premises:

1) Based on previous budget impasses, these budget crises tend to be emotional, and as much emotion should be removed from the process as possible...."
Those were my thoughts.
Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking to read and reflect upon what i have written.

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense”

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

--------Read more!-----

Sunday, July 10, 2011

WE THE PEOPLE TAR - A true, non-partisan, grassroots political movement

WE THE PEOPLE On this July 4th, 2011, the 235th anniversary of America's Declaration of Independence from the British, announce the formation of a true, non-partisan, grassroots Cultural and Political Movement to restore the Liberties and Freedoms envisioned by the Founding Fathers for WE THE PEOPLE. WE THE PEOPLE seek to restore respect for our Constitution, the Bill of Rights and to restore the Rule of Law to these United States of America.

This Movement shall be known as WE THE PEOPLE TAR.  TAR being the Acronym for Transparency, Accountability and Reform. Welcome to the 2nd Enlightenment of mankind.

At least 3 iterations of this initial document announcing the formation of this WE THE PEOPLE TAR Movement have been written. There are so many thoughts, ideas, philosophizes and issues that seem important that one regrets the need to omit some of them from this initial document. In the end, rather than try to fully explain the reasoning and logic behind our Top six issues and our 9 Principles, we decided to list them with simpler explanations and expound on the reasoning and logic in subsequent articles. In this way we hope to quickly share with you our proposed perspective of reality.

That having been said, let us cut to the chase with our top 6 proposed priorities for the next few elections:


Let us vow to not let the political parties, the politicians, the major media, special interest nor big money steer WE THE PEOPLE off topic from these 6 issues.  WE THE PEOPLE TAR believes these 6 issues are vital to restoring our liberties, freedoms, our constitution and our Bill of Rights as well as previous levels of economic opportunity for all of WE THE PEOPLE.

WE THE PEOPLE TAR asks you to write about these issues in political surveys, letters to the editor and letters to candidates themselves.  Challenge Candidates to reduce their positions on these issues to paper.  In Public Forums and Debates, ask all persons running for office what their positions are on these 6 issues. Do not let the political parties, nor any other powers that be, to frame our any elections in the future. WE THE PEOPLE will set the agenda and frame the main issues for all future elections.

1) Restore Transparency and Accountability in our Government and Judiciary
First Principles, People Are Equal Under Natural Law...."

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense”

Those were my thoughts.

Thank you, my fellow citizens, for taking to read and reflect upon what I have written.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

--------Read more!-----

Friday, July 1, 2011

Minnesota - July 5, 2011 deadline | Photos of June 28th's Health Data Hearing

June 28, 2011

Today, we surprised the MN Dept of Health. 

At least 16 citizens came into a little basement hearing room in downtown St. Paul to protest to a virtually unpublicized Minnesota Department of Health hearing related to implementing a state health information system in Minnesota. (see attached photo)  Other department folks, lobbyists and proponents were already there.

DEADLINE: Read below and know that you have 5 more days to comments (July 5 deadline - extended if a shutdown):  FMI, click here.

STATE DATA SYSTEM - The hearing was on the application from Emdeon to become a "Health Data Intermediary" (HDI) in Minnesota. As a HDI, Emdeon would act as the interchange for the sharing of private electronic medical records data. Emdeon would create a central database of clinical patient data which they would build as they conducted the data exchanges between payers (employers/health plans/government) and providers (doctors, x-ray facilitites, laboratories, clinics, hospitals, pharmaceutical benefit managers, long-term care, community clinics, etc.).

They congratulated Minnesota on its progressive nature, saying Minnesota will likely be one of their initial clients.

CCHF COMMENTS - During public comment, I told the Department that I couldn't find the hearing online even though I knew what I was looking for. I said Emdeon is only a half-baked business model. They're still building it but the Department is considering them anyway. I said they may become a monopoly (only those approved by MDH get to be in MN).I talked about the Record Locator Service (which we opposed in 2007) and Emdeon's lack of details on the opt-out. 

COSTS COULD BE HUGE - I also said that the costs are completely unclear. Is it per click or per month or per year, and who decides who pays for the exchange of data? The doctor who receives it, the health plan who sends it, the pharmacy who receives the prescription sent by the doctor or the doctor who sent it. Is there duplication of payment?

CITIZEN COMMENTS: Half of the citizens there as a result of CCHF's notice went to the microphone and spoke out about the costs, the data, the lack of consent, the privacy issues, and the potential errors within the data being shared. Their comments were great. 

For instance, Carolyn Krinkie asked, "Are the people of Minnesota informed about this. This is a democracy. I think people should be informed."  Margaret Minegar asked Emdeon to discuss their stance on universal coverage, but the committee stopped them from answering. They did say that whether there's one paer or a thousand payers," they could still do transactions. Martin Kellogg said, "If government is going down a bad road, there will always be businesses willing to assist." People laughed aloud around the room.

To protest the establishment of a state health information system, please comment by end of day on July 5 against the application of Emdeon.

Twila Brase RN, PHN
Citizens' Council for Health Freedom
1954 University Ave. W, Ste. 8
St. Paul, MN 55104


Part of the citizens group after it was over -- in front of MDH office.

Maggy speaks

Emdeon presentation to HIE Advisory Committee

To unsubscribe, reply with unsubscribe in Subject line.

  3 Attached Images

--------Read more!-----

Tuesday, June 28, 2011


This is a teaser for an article I wrote on

"WE THE PEOPLE of Minnesota have this to say about our State Government’s latest proposed Government shutdown hit list.

Hey you tyrannical #Minnesota #Politicians - If Drivers licenses, Fishing licenses, Hunting Licenses and Motor vehicle plates are not essential, by your own admissions, then lets take this opportunity to repeal all those laws requiring them.

How dare you follow Edward Bernays style Propaganda techniques to terrorize #WETHEPEOPLE into agreeing to more taxes by morbidly instilling fear in all of us?

Who are you people? You cannot be my countrymen? Nor are you patriots;  You are acting like selfish, ruthless, non-compassionate tyrannical Monsters.

WE THE PEOPLE DEMAND that you dirty, rotten tyrants of both major political parties and bureaucrat apparatchik accomplice henchmen stop playing politics on the backs and emotions of WE THE PEOPLE, your constituents.

WE THE PEOPLE are not your subjects! WE THE PEOPLE are the Sovereigns of our State and Country.  You are supposed to be our Public Servants representing us, not Ruling Class Tyrants terrorizing us into subjugation.

Why are WE THE PEOPLE so enraged? How many cuts are you proposing that are counter-intuitive to common sense? How darn ignorant is it that you shut down "user fee" backed portions of the government?..."

Thank you for taking the time to read and reflect upon what i have written.

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense”

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot


Bookmark and Share

Don Mashak's Page - Smart Girl Politics

don mashak // Current TV

Don Mashak on asamom As A Mom

Don Mashak -

The municipal debt bubble: as cities and states boost their debts by 800 percent, a housing-like crisis looms.(Columns): An article from: Reason

SEC's role in "municipal fiscal crises": Address

The banks and the municipal crisis: public responsibility and private profit. Special report to Honorable Stanley Steingut, Speaker, New York State Assembly

Propaganda * Edward Bernays

The Father of Spin: Edward L. Bernays and The Birth of Public Relation

Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports Exposed DVD


--------Read more!-----

Sunday, June 26, 2011

Strap on your thinking caps if you love Freedom - Locke vs Hobbes

This is a teaser to an article i wrote on"

"Proverbs 23:7a, "As a person thinketh in their heart, so are they."

On, there is an atmosphere of constructive intellectual exchange that challenges and causes each of us to think about why we believe what we believe. The internet represents a similar component of technological advance as Movable Type did to the First Enlightenment* (1650AD-1800AD)., and are analogous the coffeehouses and debating clubs of First Enlightenment. Through these electronic forums, Information and Ideas are being freely exchanged at a rate too fast for most governments to adapt to (for the purpose of maintaining their own power and the status quo)

One of my fellow Citizens and Patriots, responding to one of my “tweets” suggested that a split was occurring amongst WE THE PEOPLE in general and, in particular, those of us who take a greater interest in Liberty, Freedom and Politics.

My fellow citizen and cohort described this perceived split as "Libertarian" vs "Conservative". Before I say more, I thank my said cohort for bouncing their ideas off from me, so I would be inspired to reflect upon what causes me to believe what I believe in this regard. I hope that each of you are enlightened by our exchange of ideas...."

Continue reading on Strap on your thinking caps if you love Freedom - Locke vs Hobbes - Minneapolis Independent |

Thank you for taking the time to read and reflect upon what i have written.

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense”

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot


Bookmark and Share

--------Read more!-----

Friday, June 24, 2011 - Children Will Soon Be Able to Haul Their Parents Before a UN Tribunal logo
Sign the Petition Donate Volunteer Learn More View Online
June 23, 2011
Social Network Sign-up If you joined our network army last week (or want to do so now), please take a moment to fill out this online form so we can mobilize that army at the needed times this summer. Use user name tweeter and login network.

Help Wanted is seeking volunteers in preparation for our major summer campaign. We need additional national volunteer coordinators. Click here for more details.

State Resolutions
Resolutions passed Against the CRC: Oklahoma, Tennessee, and Alabama

Anti-CRC Resolutions pending: Minnesota, Georgia

Keep up to date at resolution

SR99 Has 37 Sponsors
Visit our Status page to see if your Senators are on board.

Share This Online
Facebook Twitter More...

Support Our Fight to Halt the CRC
Become a Member of

Children Will Soon Be Able to Haul Their Parents Before a UN Tribunal
On June 9th, the Human Rights Council of the United Nations approved a new treaty that will operate in parallel with the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC). Under this “Optional Protocol to the Convention of the Rights of the Child on a communications procedure” children will be able to file a quasi-judicial complaint against their parents, their government, or anyone else alleged to have violated their rights under one of the three existing child’s rights treaties.

In addition to the main CRC, there are separate treaties regarding child soldiers and sex trafficking. These parallel treaties are also called “optional protocols.”

While the United States has not become a party to the main CRC, it became a party to the other two protocol treaties in 2002.

There are two remaining steps for this new Communications Protocol to become fully operative. First, this new treaty must be approved by the United Nations General Assembly. This is a foregone conclusion. Second, ten nations must become parties to this new treaty by signing and then ratifying under whatever process is followed in their own nation. In the United States this would mean the President (or his representative) would have to sign the treaty and the U.S. Senate would have to vote to ratify.

For a long time, we have pointed out that the CRC would give children the ability to file lawsuits against their parents in American courts. The advocates for the CRC have tried to downplay this idea. But now, in broad daylight, the United Nations itself—with the full cooperation and approval of the United States in the Human Rights Council—is creating a new mechanism that forthrightly allows children to “sue” their parents and haul them before the UN Committee in Geneva.

If the United States Senate approves this Communication Protocol, even if we do not approve the main CRC treaty, legal actions could still be filed by American children before this UN tribunal. Such actions would have to arise under one of the two optional protocols to which we are a party.

As is routine for UN treaties, this new protocol requires a child to first exhaust all domestic judicial remedies before turning to the UN tribunal.

One U.S. case that would almost certainly have been appealed to the UN if this new protocol had been in place involved two California cities that banned military recruiters on high school campuses. These cities claimed that such recruiting violated the UN optional protocol on child soldiers to which we are a party.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the authority of the cities to pass such an ordinance. The disgruntled parties could then have pressed their action in the United Nations—if this new protocol had been in effect.

Obviously, the far greater danger lies in the possibility that the United States will adopt both the main Convention on the Rights of the Child and this new optional protocol. If this happens, then American parents can expect their children to threaten to “take them to Geneva” if there is a conflict over internet usage, dating, recreation, school choices, religious choices, or anything else. The scope of the UN's CRC is absolutely unlimited and any parental decision at all could become the basis for a complaint.

A friend of mine says that the goal of every committee is to rule the world. The Committee on the Rights of the Child is making a serious run at achieving this objective. There is no doubt that some nations will adopt this new protocol and the UN will have an excuse to intervene in a great number of families in ways that would have been unimaginable just a generation ago.
Action Items
Whether the UN will gain the ability to rule the families of the United States will largely depend on efforts of people like you and me. If your Senator is not already a co-sponsor of SRes 99, please call them today and urge them to stop the UN from gaining this stunningly dangerous power.


Michael Farris
P.O. Box 1090 Purcellville, VA 20134 * (540)-751-1200 *
When forwarding this email, delete from here down.

To change your contact information, contact us at 

Posted by
Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

Don Mashak on ASAMOM - As A Mom

Don Mashak's Page - Song of Truth Foundation

Don Mashak -

Don Mashak's Page - Smart Girl Politics

--------Read more!-----

Monday, June 20, 2011

Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, TV Pro-Wresting, Reality TV and the US 2 Major Party Political System Part 1 of 2




"We have a tradition in America of imparting to our children seemingly harmless, fanciful perceptions of reality. The Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus are all fanciful myths aka manufactured false perceptions of reality.  Almost all of us Americans fervently believed at least one of these fantasies in our early lives.

Our Parents and teachers and other people in our lives imparted to us a belief in these myths as being true.

And, we believe these stories basically for 4 different reasons:

  1. At that age, we are less sophisticated and less able to discern truth from fiction.
  2. And, regardless of our age, more likely believe something we are told when it told to us by people we trust and/or love. 
  3. Circumstantial evidence – Money replacing the teeth. Easter Baskets on Easter Morning.  Easter egg hunts at Church. The cookies and milk we set out for Santa were gone the next morning.  Jingle bells outside of the house at the appropriate time. Children’s Books dedicated to the subject. TV ads and programs espousing the existence of said Santa Claus, etc.
  4. The fictional perception of reality is more desirable than the alternative. In short, we want to believe because we benefit or perceive benefit from going along with the myth.  e.g. money, candy, gifts. And these myths also give us a nebulous, warm fuzzy feeling and sense of security. They made the world seem less harsh and friendlier.

If we are honest with ourselves, we will acknowledge that our youthful “perception of reality” incorporated unquestioning and absolute belief in the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny and/or Santa Claus. Regardless of how easily we can disprove that reality now, and how ridiculous our belief in them seems on retrospection,   we believed in these myths at one point in our lives. We accepted these myths as the truth and they were our Reality.  Through these myths, almost all Americans share the experience of believing in a perception of reality that was never real, despite our once fervent belief that they were.

And we did not easily give up our beliefs in these myths. Even when harsh reality was brought to our attention some of desperately clung to the fantasy...  I can remember some kids in the school yard fighting their peers who were the bearer of bad news.  Others were more restrained in their responses, waiting to go home and check with a trusted and reliable source, their parents.  I did not want to believe that my parents would believe me.  And for those that clung to the myth, there was the peer pressure of being ridiculed and being called immature.

But once the individual overcame their desire for their false perception of reality to be true, they very quickly came to realize the discrepancies in the myth.  For example, the impossibility of one single person such as Santa Claus delivering gifts to every household in one night…  Or the impossibility of reindeer and a sleigh defying the law of gravity.  They all seem so obvious in retrospect.

However, other myths and mysteries of life don’t offer the same absolute proof and closure as the false perceptions of reality involving Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus. And these myths, fantasies, deceptions, delusions and duplicities are far more injurious than our childhood fantasies.


Essentially, each person’s perception of reality comes only from their daily interactions and cumulative inputs to their senses of sight, sound, smell, taste and touch. and
With that in mind, I ask you each to go back to that period of your life when you fervently believed in the Tooth Fairy, the Easter Bunny and Santa Claus...."

To Read the rest of the story for free continue reading on Tooth Fairy, Easter Bunny, Santa Claus, Pro-Wresting & the US 2 Party System 1/2 - Minneapolis Independent |

I write this article with the same intentions as Thomas Paine I seek no leadership role. I seek only to help the American People find their own way using their own “Common Sense

Thank you for Taking the Time to Read this.

Those were my thoughts.

In Liberty,

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot


Bookmark and Share

Minnesota Injustice: True Court Horror Cases - With Names

Don Mashak's Page - Patriot Action Network
Don Mashak on Song of Truth Foundation
DON MASHAK'S PAGE on American Voice
Don Mashak's Page - Smart Girl Politics
Don Mashak (dmashak) - Digg
Don Mashak's Minnesota 10th Judicial District Free Press
Don Mashak - Discover Don Mashak pages on StumbleUpon
don mashak // Current TV
Google Buzz / Don Mashak on Google Buzz / Don Mashak | BoardReader
Don Mashak's Page - 12160
Don Mashak on ASAMOM
Don Mashak on Well Regulated American Militias

--------Read more!-----

Sunday, June 12, 2011

ALL "governments" operate under FRAUD & SECRECY !! - Can anyone vet or substantiate any of this?

I post this here unvetted and as food for thought.  I do not have time to vet this.  Is there anyone out there that can vet or substantiate this?

In summary, this has to do with an alleged conspiracy that the USA is now a corporation owned by the Queen of England and each of us are no longer sovereign citizens and collateral for a loan. Also, there is reference to a series of laws that basically extinguish the Constitution and Bill of Rights.


Here is the article.


Why The UCC Filing?

Short Explanation as is Understood at this Time
(Subject to further clarification)

Around the time of the war between the United States and the
southern states of the American union, the United States was busy
putting together a plan that would increase the jurisdiction of the
United States.  This plan was necessary because the United States
had no subjects and only the land ceded to it from the states, ie.
the District which was only ten miles square and such land as was
necessary for forts, magazines, arsenals, etc.

Between the 1860's and the early 1900's, banking and taxing
mechanisms were changing through legislation.  Cunning people
closely associated with the powers in England had great influence on
the legislation being passed in the United States.  Of course such
legislation did not apply to the states or to the people in the
states, but making the distinction was not deemed to be a necessary
duty of the legislators.  It was the responsibility of the people to
understand their relationship to the United States and to the laws
that were being passed by the legislature.  This distinction between
the United States and the states was taught in the homes and the
schools and churches.  The early admiralty courts did not interpret
legislation as broadly at that time because the people knew when the
courts were overstepping their jurisdiction.  The people were in
control because they knew who they were and where they were standing
in relation to the United States.

In 1913 the United States added numerous private laws to its books
that facilitated the increase of subjects and property for the
United States.  The 14th Amendment provided for a new class of
citizens  United States citizens, that had not formerly been
recognized.  Until the 14th Amendment in 1868, there were no persons
born or naturalized in the United States.  They had all been born or
naturalized in one of the several states.  United States citizenship
was a result of state citizenship.  After the Civil War, a new class
was recognized, and was the beginning of the democracy sited in the
District of Columbia.  The American people in the republic sited in
the several states, could choose to benefit as one of these new
United States citizens BY CHOICE.  The new class of citizens was
given the right to vote in the democracy in 1870 by the 15th
Amendment.  All it required was an application.  Benefits came with
this new citizenship, but with the benefits, came duties and
responsibilities that were totally regulated by the legislature for
the District of Columbia.  Edward Mandell House is attributed with
giving a very detailed outline of the plans to be implemented to
enslave the American people.  (1) The 13th Amendment in 1865 opened
the way for the people to volunteer into slavery to accept the
benefits offered by the United States.  Whether House actually spoke
the words or not , is really irrelevant because the scenario
detailed in the statement attributed to him has clearly been
implemented.  Central banking for the United States was legislated
with the Federal Reserve Act in 1913.  The ability to decrease the
currency in circulation through taxation was legislated with the
16th Amendment in 1913.  Support for the presumption that the
American people had volunteered to participate in the United States
democracy was legislated with the 17th Amendment in 1913.  The path
was provided for the control of the courts, with the creation of the
American Bar Association in 1913.

In 1917 the United States legislature passed the Trading with the
Enemy Act and the Emergency War Powers Act, opening the doors for
the United States to suspend limitations otherwise mandated in the
Constitution.  Even in times of peace, every contrived and created
social, political, or financial emergency was sufficient authority
for the officers of the United States to overstep its peace time
powers and implement volumes of "law" that would increase the
coffers of the United States.  There is always a declared emergency
in the United States and its States, but it only applies to their

In the 1920's the States accelerated the push for mothers to
register their babies.  Life was good and people were not paying
attention to what was happening in government.  The stock market
crashed, and those who were not on the inside were not warned to
take their money out before they lost everything.

In the 1930's federal legislation provided for registration of
babies through applications for birth certificates, so government
workers could get maternity leave with pay.  The States pushed for
registration of cars through applications for certificates of title,
and for registration of land through registration of deeds of trust.
Constructive trusts secretly were created as each of the people
blindly walked into the United States democracy, thereby agreeing to
be sureties for the debts of the United States.  The great
depression supplied the diversion to keep the people's attention off
what government was doing.  The Social Security program was
implemented, along with numerous other United States programs that
invited the American people to volunteer to be the sureties behind
the United States' new registered property and adhesion contracts
through the new United States subjects.

The plan was well on its path by 1933.  Massive registration of
property through United States agencies, including the State of
_______ subdivisions, was assuring the United States and its
officers would get rich beyond their wildest expectations, as
predicted by Mendall House.  All of this was done without disclosure
of the material facts that accompanied each application for
registration  fraud.  The fraud was a sufficient reason to charge
all the United States officers with treason, UNLESS a remedy could
be supplied for the people to recoup their property and collect for
the damages they suffered as a result of the fraud.

If a remedy were available, and the people chose not to or failed to
use their remedy, no charge of fraud could be sustained even in a
common law court.  The United States only needed to provide the
remedy.  It was not required to explain it or even tell the people
where the remedy could be found.  The attorneys did not even have to
be taught about the remedy.  That gave them plausible deniability
when the people struggled to understand the new laws.  The
legislators did not have to have the intricate details of the law
explained to them regarding the bills they were passing.  That gave
them plausible deniability.  If the people failed to use their
remedy, the United States came out the winner every time.  If the
people did discover their remedy, the United States had to honor it
and release the registered property back to the people, but only if
the people knew they had a remedy, and only if they requested it in
the proper manner.  It was a great plan.

With plausible deniability, even when the people knew they had a
remedy and pursued it, the attorneys, judges, and legislators could
act like they did not understand the people's claims.  Requiring the
public schools to teach civics, government, and history classes out
of approved politically correct text books also assured the people
would not find the remedy for a long time.  Passing new State and
Federal laws that appeared to subject the people to rules and
regulations, added another level of protection against the people
finding their remedy.  The public media was molded to report
politically correct, though substantially incorrect, news day after
day, until few people would even think there could be a remedy
available to them.  The people could be separated from their money
and their time to pursue the remedy long enough for the solutions to
be lost in the pages of millions of books in huge law libraries
across the country.  So many people know there is something wrong
with all the conflicts in the laws with the "facts" taught in the
schools.  How can the American people be free and subject to a
sovereign governments whims at the same time?  Who would ever have
thought the people would be resourceful enough to actually find the
remedy?  BUT they did!

In 1933 the United States put its insurance policy into place with
House Joint Resolution 192 (2) and recorded it in the Congressional
Record.  It was not required to be promulgated in the Federal
Register.  An Executive Order issued on April 5, 1933 paving the way
for the withdrawal of gold in the United States.  Representative
Louis T.  McFadden brought formal charges on May 23, 1933 against
the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, the
Comptroller of the Currency, and the Secretary of the United States
Treasury (Congressional Record May 23, 1933 page 4055-4058).  HJR
192 passed on June 3, 1933.  Mr. MaFadden claimed on June 10, 1933:
"Mr.  Chairman, we have in this country one of the most corrupt
institutions the world has ever known.  I refer to the Federal
Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks " HJR 192 is the
insurance policy that protects the legislators from conviction for
fraud and treason against the American people.  It also protects the
American people from damages caused by the actions of the United

HJR 192 provided that the one with the gold paid the bills.  It
removed the requirement that the United States subjects and
employees had to pay their debts with gold.  It actually prohibited
the inclusion of a clause in all subsequent contracts that would
require payment in gold.  It also cancelled the clause in every
contract written prior to June 5, 1933, that required an obligation
to be paid in gold  retroactively.  It provided that the United
States subjects and employees could use any type of coin and
currency to discharge a public debt as long as it was in use in the
normal course of business in the United States.  For a time, United
States Notes were the currency used to discharge debts, but later
the Federal Reserve and the United States provided a new medium of
exchange through paper notes, and debt instruments that could be
passed on to a debtor's creditors to discharge the debtor's debts.
That same currency is available to us to use to discharge public

In the 1950's the Uniform Commercial Code was presented to the
States as a means of unifying the generally accepted procedures for
handling the new legal system of dealing with commercial fictions as
though they were real.  Security instruments replaced substance as
collateral for debts.  Security instruments could be supported by
presumptive contracts.  Debt instruments with collateral, and
accommodating parties, could be used instead of money.  Money and
the need for money was disappearing, and a uniform system of laws
had to be put in place to allow the courts to uphold the security
instruments that depended on commercial fictions as a basis for
compelling payment or performance.  All this was accomplished by the
mid 1960's.

The commercial code is merely a codification of accepted and
required procedures all people engaged in commercial activities must
follow.  The basic principles of commerce had been settled thousands
of years ago, but were refined as commerce become more sophisticated
over the years.  In the 1900's the age-old principles of commerce
shifted from substance to form.  Presumption became a big part of
the law.  Without giving a degree of force to presumption, the new
direction in enforcing commercial claims could not be supported in
courts.  If the claimants were required to produce their claims
every time they tried to collect money or time from the people, they
would seldom be successful.  The principles expressed in the code
combine the means of dealing with substantive commercial activities
with the means of dealing with presumptive commercial activities.
These principles work as well for the people as they do for the
deceivers.  The rules do not respect persons.

Those who enticed the people to register their things with the
United States and its sub-divisions, gained control of the substance
through the registrations.  The United States became the Holder of
the titles to many things.  The definition of "property" is the
interest one has in a thing.  The thing is the principal.  The
property is the interest in the thing.  Profits (interest) made from
the property of another, belong to the owner of the thing.  Profits
were made by the deceivers by pledging the registered property in
commercial markets, but the profits do not belong to the deceivers.
The profits belong to the owners of the things.  That is always the
people.  The corporation only shows ownership of paper  titles to
things.  The substance cannot appear in the fiction.  [[Watch the
movie Last Action Hero and watch the confusion created when they try
to mix substance and fiction.]] Sometimes the fiction is made to
look very much like substance, but fiction can never become
substance.  It is an impossibility.

The profits from all the registered things had to be put into trust
(constructive) for the benefit of the owners.  If the profits were
put into the general fund of the United States and not into separate
trusts for the owners, the scheme would represent fraud.  The
profits for each owner could not be commingled.  If the owner failed
to use his available remedy (fictional credits held in a
constructive trust account, fund, or financial ledger) to benefit
from the profits, it would not be the fault of the deceivers.  If
the owner failed to learn the law that would open the door to his
remedy, it would not be the fault of the deceivers.  The owner is
responsible for learning the law, so he understands that the profits
from his things are available for him to discharge debts or charges
brought against his public person by the United States.

If the United States has the "gold", the United States pays the
bills (from the trust account, fund, or financial ledger).  The
definition of "fund" is money set aside to pay a debt.  The fund is
there to discharge the public debts attributed to the United States
subjects, but ultimately back to the accommodating parties  the
American people.  The national debt that is owed is to the owners of
the registered things  the American people, as well as to other

If the United States owes a debt to the owner of the thing, and the
owner is presumed (by accommodation) to owe a public debt to the
United States, the logical thing is to ask the United States to
discharge that public debt from the trust fund.  The way for the
United States to get around having to pay the public debts for the
people is to claim the owner cannot be an owner if he agreed to be
the accommodating party for a debtor person.  If the people are
truly the principle, then they know how to handle their financial
and political affairs, ULNESS they have never been taught.  If the
owner admits by his actions out of ignorance, that he is an
accommodating party, he has taken on the debtor's liabilities
without getting consideration in exchange.  Here lies the fiction
again.  The owner of the thing does not have to knowingly agree to
be the accommodating party for the debtor person; he just has to act
like he agreed.  That is easy if he has a choice of going to jail or
signing for the debtor person.  The presumption that he is the
accommodating party is strong enough for the courts to hold the
owner of the thing liable for a tax on the thing he actually owns.

Debtors may have the use of certain things, but the things belong to
the creditors.  The creditor is the master.  The debtor is the
servant.  The Uniform Commercial Code is very specific about the
duties and responsibilities a debtor has.  If the owner of the thing
is presumed to be a debtor because of his previous admissions and
adhesion contracts, he is going to have a difficult time convincing
the United States that it has a duty to discharge public debts for
him.  In addition, the courts are staffed with loyal judges who will
look for every mistake the people make when trying to use their

There is a very powerful tool the people can use to help them get to
the real issues when they find themselves up against the power of
presumption.  The law provides for either party of an admiralty
court action to OBJECT to a line of questioning.  When you object in
that court setting, you must tell the judge why you object, or he
will overrule your objection.  The reason is:

"This line of questioning assumes facts not in evidence."

You can request that evidence of the Plaintiff's claim be entered as
evidence.  If the judge overrules this fundamental, basic,
underlying, necessary principle of establishing jurisdiction and
right to make a charge, there is a major procedural error in the
proceeding.  Granting impersonam jurisdiction to get to the bottom
of the issue is vastly better than arguing, "I'm not that person."

The owner of the thing, after learning the law and discovering who
he is in relation to the United States, can file a UCC Financing
Statement and Security Agreement registering his interest in the
artificial entity (PERSON) the United States created after Mom
applied for a birth certificate.  That was the act of registering
her biological property, her baby (substance), with the State of
_______.  The United States holds the paper title (form), not the
substance (baby).  Until your Financing Statement is filed, the
United States is the holder of the title to the artificial entity.
Its name is spelled in all capital letter  JOHN HENRY DOE.  When
John Henry Doe files the Financing Statement supported by a Security
Agreement signed by the artificial entity (JOHN) and the owner
(John), he becomes the holder in due course of the title to JOHN.
The UCC and the State commercial law are very specific about the
effect of a registered security interest.  It has priority over most
other interest claimed (only claimed) in the same thing.  The
evidence that is missing in the court, is the registered claim over
the person (JOHN).

The owner also must notify the Secretary of the Treasury that he is
going to handle his own affairs in the future.  He can file a Bill
of Exchange with the Secretary through which he exchanges his
person's accepted-for-value birth certificate and social security
numbers, for a chargeback of all the presumed charges brought
against his person since the birth certificate was issued.

The owner can also reserve a noncash Federal Reserve routing number
and any number of noncash instrument numbers by filing an amendment
to his Financing Statement or just including his reservation on his
original Financing Statement.  Each bank account opened in the name
of the owner's person has a routing number.  If an account is open,
it is available to process cash items.  If you write a check to the
plumber, it can be converted to cash at your bank.  You cannot write
a check on an account that has been closed.  Those accounts and
their routing numbers are reserved for noncash items for the person
(JOHN) that opened the account originally.  Accounts that have been
closed by the bank instead of the person, should not be used for
noncash items.  Once this is done, you are in a position to begin
receiving reimbursements against the obligation the United States
owes to you for money and time it has received that belong to you.

The owner of registered things, who has learned the law and what his
rights are, and has filed his Financing Statement, Security
Agreement, and Bill of Exchange, and reserved his noncash account
routing numbers, can issue an instrument indicating his UCC
registration number, his registered Federal Reserve routing number,
the name of the public party making a charge against his person, and
the amount of the debt to be discharge.

Think of the whole transaction in relation to a dead battery.  The
batter represents your public person (JOHN), which is a dead entity
that can function within the public maize of fiction, transmitting
benefits from the public to you in the private IF it is charged up.
You cannot go into the public because you are not a fiction.  JOHN
has no power until it is charged with some energy.  That energy
comes from an IRS default notice, court judgment, credit card bill,
utility bill, traffic ticket, or some other instrument that has a $
amount and JOHN's name on it as the presumed debtor.  The bill is
the energy.  It charges the dead JOHN.  You can now discharge JOHN
and put JOHN's accrual account with the charging party back to a
zero balance.  You as the secured party over the assets put up as
security by JOHN to you as collateral for the debt JOHN owes you,
can discharge JOHN with a negotiable instrument for the same $
amount as the charging instrument.  The charging party that receives
your noncash item can 1) process it through a United States
department, 2) give it to a third party, 3) keep it to increase its

When you, as the owner of a thing, registered it with the United
States or one of its subdivisions, you let the United States hold
the legal title to your thing based on misrepresentation and failure
to disclose material facts to you at the time of registration.  You
probably retained possession of the thing.  The United States
invested the title and made a profit.  If you did not specifically
authorize the United States and its agents to invest the legal
title, the profits made from that title belong to you, because as
the owner, you remain the equitable title holder.  Legally all the
profits from the investment of the titles to all your registered
things must go into a fund for your benefit.  If they did not put
the profits in a trust fund of some sort, it would be fraud.

Just acquiring the titles through what is promoted as mandatory
registration, is fraud.  If the scenario attributed to Mandell House
is now in full application in the United States, which it is, the
officers of the United States could be charged and convicted with
treason IF they had not provided a remedy, which they did.  -- House
Joint Resolution 192 on June 5, 1933.  This is their insurance
policy to assure they are not convicted of treason.  That does not
mean they cannot be charged with treason, but the courts will
dismiss based on failure to state a claim upon which relief can be
granted.  Because you have a remedy outside the court, you cannot
sustain a charge of treason.

The problem in the past with trying to discharge public debts with
instruments that could not be processed through your bank on the
corner, was that those discharge instruments did not route through
the Federal Reserve.  It is the bean counter for the national debt.
That debt is first and primarily owed to the people who are the
equitable titleholders of all the substance in this country.  If you
try to discharge a public debt with your discharge instrument, and
you do not route it through the Federal Reserve, it appears you are
receiving a benefit from the United States without exchanging it for
something of value.  This is not technically correct because you
have a right to be reimbursed, whether or not you apply it toward
the debt the United States owes you.  You are the substance; it is
the fiction.

If you do route your discharge instrument through the Federal
Reserve, where the national debt owed to you can be reduced by the
amount of the instrument, you have made an exchange that fits nicely
into their accrual bookkeeping system.  Your PERSON's charge from
the charging party within the United States commercial scheme is
discharged, and the debt the United States owes to you is discharged
by the same amount.  That is a quid pro quo, and everyone is happy,
EXCEPT those who are not interested in the money but just want to be
in control from behind the scenes.

To accomplish this quid pro quo exchange:

1.  your claim to being one of the people must appear on a public
register (the Secretary of State),

2.  you must have an account with the banker for the United States
(the Secretary of the Treasury),

3.  you must have given notice of your reservation of routing
numbers through the national debt accountant (the Federal Reserve),

4.  you must refer to the insurance policy that covers your remedy
(House Joint Resolution 192),

5.  you must make your instrument negotiable so it can be used by
the United States for a profit,

6.  you must transmit your instrument back into the public through
an agent (your registered debtor),

7. you must only use a noncash item for this exchange,

8.  you must do a banker's acceptance of a charging instrument to
attach to your noncash item, and

9.  you must understand that you are not getting something for

Reserving your routing numbers to use on your discharge instruments
is not as difficult as was thought during the previous decade.
Every person has opened bank accounts in the past that have been
closed for one reason for another.  On the bottom of the checks for
those closed bank accounts is a routing number to the particular
bank and a routing number to the particular account.  Each check has
a check number.  When you put the check number together with the two
routing numbers, you have a means of tracking each item that goes
through the worldwide banking system.  The routing numbers on the
bottom of the checks from accounts your person has closed will never
be reassigned.  They are attached to your person's NAME forever and
kept in the records of the Federal Reserve.

Bank accounts that are still open and active are used for cash
items.  Checks written on these open bank accounts can be taken to
the particular bank and CASHED.  This is the type of instrument used
in commercial transactions everyday.  There is a fund attached to
the check from which the debt evidenced by the check can be paid.

Bank accounts that are no longer open and active cannot be used to
process cash items.  They can only be used to process noncash items.
They require special handling.  Title 12 of USC and CFR explain how
and when receiving banks are to process noncash items.  A closed
bank account associated with your debtor's NAME, has routing numbers
that can route your discharge instrument through the Federal Reserve
to reduce the national debt to you and increase the balance of the
bank account of the party that is charging your debtor.  It is a WIN
WIN situation.

The charging party is instructed to mail the discharge instrument to
the Secretary of Transportation.  Title 46 has sufficient evidence
to support the proposition that the Secretary is the trustee over
some or all vessels mortgaged by the United States.  If your debtor
PERSON is presumed to be a vessel, it is regulated by the Secretary
of Transportation through the Maritime Ministries Administration,
that is the proper party to assist in processing your noncash item.
The Secretary of Transportation can forward the item to the
Secretary of the Treasury, who already has been notified to prepare
for noncash activity in your treasury direct account on the Bill of
Exchange.  The Secretary of the Treasury is directly related to the
Federal Reserve.  Between the Treasury and the Federal Reserve, your
noncash item can be directed to the proper parties to settle the
account and get everyone into that quid pro quo position we want.

The United States and its co-business partners are debtors to you.
You are the creditor, not only over your debtor PERSON, but also
over the United States, the legal titleholder over the registered
things to which you are the equitable titleholder.  You are the
primary creditor, so if the United States has other creditors, like
the international bankers, they cannot jump to the front of the
line.  Their claims are subordinated to your claims if your claims
are registered and if you understand the law surrounding what you
are doing.


Posted by:

Don Mashak
The Cynical Patriot

Don Mashak's Page - Song of Truth Foundation 

Don Mashak's Page - Patriot Action Network

Don Mashak -

Don Mashak's Page - Smart Girl Politics


Don Mashak's Page - Tea Party Students

Don Mashak's Minnesota 10th Judicial District Free Press

don mashak // Current TV


--------Read more!-----